“Lifting the Burka off the Burkini”- Column in Toronto Sun exposes the Islamist Agenda

sexy burkini

“If both swimsuits [the burkini and the wetsuit] provide head-to-toe cover, why don’t these Muslim women wear the wetsuit? Why do they insist on the burkini? After all, the wetsuit would meet all the silly requirements imposed by man-made sharia laws that have forced the Muslim world to be permanently anchored in medieval times.”


August 31, 2016

Tarek Fatah
The Toronto Sun

In their hysterical reaction to the “burkini ban” in France, bleeding-heart liberals in the West demonstrated again how gullible they are and how easy it is for the worldwide Islamist movement to manipulate them.

In carefully staged theatre, the Islamists pulled off a stunt by making Muslim women out to be victims of white, male, armed police.

They tugged at our outrage whenever we see the state trampling on individual liberty, especially if the victim is a female.

Thus a video of a woman being beaten by a gang of Muslim men, somewhere in Europe or North Africa, barely raised an eyebrow, and didn’t make it to the front pages of any newspaper or TV network.

However, the sight of a middle-aged Muslim woman napping in full body attire in 35 Celsius heat, with cameramen, being asked to leave the beach, or take off one layer of her burkini wrap, was enough to raise cries of racism, misogyny, bigotry and every possible human rights violation in the UN Charter.

Burkini vs Wetsuit2One image, circulated on the micro blogging and social networking website Tumblr, best captured the logic of the left. It showed two women in almost identical full-body swimsuits, with the title:

“French Muslim in Burkini French Catholic in Wetsuit.”

Below the picture, the caption read:

“Only one will be asked to remove her swimming gear at gunpoint.”

To the defenders of the burkini, the picture illustrated Western racism and double standards.

To me, the picture raised a question:

“If both swimsuits provide head-to-toe cover, why don’t these Muslim women wear the wetsuit? Why do they insist on the burkini?”

After all, the wetsuit would meet all the silly requirements imposed by man-made sharia laws that have forced the Muslim world to be permanently anchored in medieval times.

That is when I had a eureka moment in understanding why the burkini is being pushed upon Muslim women, when for a good 1,400 years, we Muslims had no use for it.

The burkini is supposed to be many things, but above all it is a tool to “slut shame” western women, and Muslim women, who wear traditional beach wear, be it bikinis or a single piece swimsuit.

The objective is to project devout Muslim women as pious and pure females who are the guardians of the family’s honour, and to contrast them to non-Muslim or non-observant Muslim women who are of “loose character”.

As this twisted logic goes, the latter are sexually bound to a culture of immorality, cursed by Allah to, as infidels, burn in hellfire, for exposing their skin to entice men and trigger their sexual arousal.

American Muslim reformist Shireen Qudosi made a scathing attack on the burkini in a Fox News column.

She wrote, the burkini is an extension of the burka, which was “a totem of feminist oppression”.

The burkini, she said, was the result of “an abusive cultural conditioning” of Muslim women.

As for those who believe in the notion of “choice”, well, I’m sorry, but nudists should not have the choice to roam naked on Toronto’s lakefront or Vancouver’s shores; white supremacists should not have the choice to wear KKK bath wear while sun tanning, and neo-Nazis should not have the choice to have swastikas stitched on to their briefs or bikini tops.

3 comments for ““Lifting the Burka off the Burkini”- Column in Toronto Sun exposes the Islamist Agenda

  1. Nancy
    September 1, 2016 at 4:45 AM

    Tarek have you ever tried to put on a wetsuit??? It’s really hard to get on and also compresses one’s chest. Huge meh to the wetsuit.

    Btw that video is disgusting and needs to (in my opinion ) have attention brought to it. I hope those beasts were identified and charged.

    Appreciating you,

    • September 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM

      I agree with Nancy. Their is an element In Islam that brings the beast out in some men.

      You can call it Original Sin, the dark side or whatever metaphor you like, these men should be rounded up and taken to Gitmo and subjected to the same punishment that they meted out, after all the Koran would approve(theoretically).

      This is the religion of peace? I would hate to see it if they really became angry. Which is why Israel will never let Iran get the atomic bomb, despite Obama’s best efforts to assist them.

      He is an angry black man who is trying to get even with history. Who was that party that supported slavery,( even the democrats in the North), perfected unjust lynchings, passed Jim Crow laws. Used dogs and fire hoses to stop people from excercising their God given human rights.

      The party that opposed reforms after the civil war, hardly civil when brother killed brother/father/sister.

      That dark side exists in us all, we all could of been German citizens during WWII and did nothing. As much as I disrespect the Republican Establishment, the Republicans were the party of LIncoln and the party opposed to slavery.

      The Civil Rights revolution started in the 1860’s and were opposed by democrats. So was the 13 Amendment which abolished slavery. The 14th Amendment was opposed by the democrats as well.

      So why are blacks democrats. They have been deceived and when studying hard is mocked as being Asian or white it is not to hard to trick the majority of blacks. Black leaders love the status quo as it provides them a luxurious life, something impossible if they had to rely on their work ethic and knowledge base. But then as Hobbes said. life is short. nasty and brutish.

      So today telling the truth is the new hate speech, just as foretold by Orwell in 1984 and Animal Farm.

      Since education has been hijacked by democratic socialist policies like a virus hijacks the machinery of the cell and produces more viruses that kill the cell and possible the organism, so pernicious and evil policies blight America. Several ways to extirpate cancer.

      We best be quick so that some freedom will survive. ..Just sayin

  2. Harbey Whiner
    September 5, 2016 at 10:36 AM

    I lived in Cairo in 1974 and there was nary a hijab in sight. Egyptian ladies and young girls actually could buy a bikini and sun at the beach. Granted there were very few young ladies walking the streets after dark. There were a lot of men walking the streets holding hands with other men which more a custom that an indication of their sexual preference. In 1976 the Muslim Brotherhood arrived and by 1979 the hijab followed. Egyptian women in bikinis became a thing of the past. Westerners, particularly the liberal progressives who play their hypocritical game of “tolerance” and “inclusiveness” have little knowledge of the evolution of the Islamic “religious requirement” for modesty. It has everything to do with control and pushing an agenda and little to do with religion. Kamal Al-solaylee captured the evolution in his ecellent book, Intolerable”, a must read for those liberal progressives amongst us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *